AI-Proof Jobs by State (2026): Where Work Is Most and Least Exposed to AI

Original research · BLS AI exposure categories and BLS job counts by state · Updated September 28, 2026

Data through: jobs by occupation and state, May 2025 (BLS OEWS) · AI exposure categories published August 27, 2026 (BLS) · Microsoft AI applicability scores v1.1 (December 2025) · Anthropic job exposure file (March 2026) · business AI use survey through September 6, 2026 (Census)

Nearly 1 in 3 U.S. jobs is in work where AI overlaps the most. 31.7% of jobs (49.2 million) are in occupations the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) rates “Very high” for AI exposure. Only 17.6% (27.4 million) are rated “Low.” D.C. has the highest share at 48.9%, followed by Colorado (36.4%) and Maryland (36.1%). Wyoming (24.6%) and Mississippi (24.9%) have the lowest. Exposure is not job loss. It means AI could help with or do some of the tasks in a job. It does not mean the job goes away.

Key findings

  • 49.2 million U.S. jobs (31.7%) are in “Very high” AI exposure occupations. Another 24.7% are “High,” 26.0% “Moderate” and 17.6% “Low.” The biggest “Very high” job isn’t in an office. It’s retail salespersons (3.9 million jobs), then customer service reps and general office clerks.
  • D.C. stands alone. After that, the states are closer than you might think. In D.C., 48.9% of jobs are “Very high,” 12.6 points ahead of #2 Colorado. Every state falls between 24.6% (Wyoming) and 36.4% (Colorado). The top five: D.C. (48.9%), Colorado (36.4%), Maryland (36.1%), Virginia (35.8%), Massachusetts (35.3%). The bottom five: Wyoming (24.6%), Mississippi (24.9%), North Dakota (25.3%), West Virginia (25.5%), Louisiana (26.0%).
  • Hands-on small-business work is rated Low or Moderate. Of the 20 hands-on jobs we checked, 9 are “Low” (carpenters, roofers, painters, landscapers, tree trimmers, janitors, maids, massage therapists and general maintenance workers) and 11 are “Moderate” (including electricians, plumbers, HVAC techs, hairstylists and childcare workers). None is “High” or “Very high.” 7 of the 9 common desk jobs we compared are “Very high.”
  • More-exposed jobs tend to pay more. The typical job in the “Very high” group is in an occupation with median pay of $69,990. In the “Low” group it’s $42,260, and in “Moderate” $38,020. But some hands-on trades pay well with little AI overlap: electricians ($63,190), plumbers ($63,800) and HVAC techs ($61,010).
  • Three different AI measures put the states in nearly the same order. Microsoft’s AI applicability score matches the BLS ranking with a rank correlation of 0.93, and Anthropic’s observed exposure with 0.96 (1.00 = identical). Of the 10 most exposed states on the BLS measure, 9 are also in Microsoft’s top 10 and 8 in Anthropic’s. They agree less on individual jobs (rank correlation 0.58 between Microsoft and Anthropic).
  • States with more highly exposed jobs also report more business AI use. The share of “Very high” jobs lines up with the share of businesses using AI in the Census Bureau’s survey (correlation 0.60 across the 49 states with survey data). See our small-business AI use by state study.

Map: where the most jobs are highly exposed to AI

U.S. map shading each state by the share of jobs in occupations BLS rates Very high for AI exposure. Darkest: D.C. 48.9%, Colorado 36.4%, Maryland 36.1%, Virginia 35.8% and Massachusetts 35.3%. Lightest: Wyoming 24.6%, Mississippi 24.9%, North Dakota 25.3%, West Virginia 25.5% and Louisiana 26.0%.
Share of each state’s jobs in occupations BLS rates “Very high” for AI exposure. May 2025 job counts.

The pattern follows office work. The bigger a state’s share of management, business and finance, computer and legal jobs, the higher its “Very high” share (correlation 0.94). Those jobs make up 42.9% of all jobs in D.C. and 23.5% in Maryland, compared with 18.2% nationwide and 10.2% in Mississippi.

Most and least exposed states

Stacked bar chart of the 10 most and 10 least AI-exposed states by share of jobs in each BLS exposure category. D.C. has 48.9% Very high and 9.1% Low. Wyoming has 24.6% Very high and 22.1% Low. The U.S. is 31.7% Very high and 17.6% Low.
Share of jobs in each BLS AI exposure category. Top 10 and bottom 10 states by the “Very high” share, with the U.S. in the middle.

Flip the list around and you get the states with the most “Low” exposure jobs: Mississippi (22.3%), Wyoming (22.1%), South Dakota (21.7%), North Dakota (21.5%), Louisiana (21.3%). D.C. has the fewest, at 9.1%.

Big states sit near the middle. California ranks #18 (31.7%), Texas #16 (32.4%), Florida #7 (34.3%) and New York #9 (34.1%). In raw numbers, that is still a lot of people: 5,757,260 “Very high” jobs in California and 4,546,430 in Texas.

What “AI exposure” means (and doesn’t)

In August 2026, BLS gave every occupation it tracks one of four labels: Low, Moderate, High or Very high. The label says how much of the job’s work AI tools could help with or do, compared with other jobs. BLS built it from five research sources. Three score what AI could do in theory. Two, from Microsoft and Anthropic, look at what people actually ask AI chatbots to do.

In BLS’s own words: “Exposure does not imply job loss, productivity gains, automation probability, or wage effects.” A “Very high” job may change a lot or very little. A “Low” job isn’t guaranteed to stay the same. No job is truly AI-proof. When we say “AI-proof” on this page, we mean the jobs where AI overlaps least today.

The labels are relative. Each group holds roughly a quarter of the 831 occupations. They don’t hold equal numbers of workers, because some jobs are much bigger than others.

U.S. jobs by BLS AI exposure category
BLS AI exposure Occupations U.S. jobs, May 2025 Share of jobs Typical pay (median)* BLS projected growth, 2025–35
Low 212 27.4 million 17.6% $42,260 +2.5%
Moderate 206 40.4 million 26.0% $38,020 +6.2%
High 206 38.4 million 24.7% $69,250 +3.1%
Very high 206 49.2 million 31.7% $69,990 +2.0%

*Pay of the middle job when every job in the group is lined up by its occupation’s median pay. Growth uses BLS projections, which cover more workers (including the self-employed) than the May 2025 job counts.

BLS expects the “Moderate” group to grow fastest (+6.2% by 2035) and the “Very high” group slowest (+2.0%). That’s a slower-growth outlook, not a forecast of layoffs.

“AI-proof” small-business jobs: trades and personal services

If you’re choosing a business to start, the jobs AI overlaps least are the ones where you have to show up. Someone has to run the wire, clear the drain, trim the tree, clean the office and watch the kids.

Bar chart of BLS projected job growth for small-business occupations, labeled with AI exposure. HVAC +10.9% Moderate, electricians +9.2% Moderate, plumbers +6.8% Moderate, massage therapists +15.3% Low, landscapers +4.7% Low. Desk jobs: secretaries -6.0% Very high, bookkeeping clerks -5.6% Very high, customer service reps -5.3% Very high.
BLS projected job growth 2025–35 with each job’s BLS AI exposure category.

A few things stand out:

  • The licensed trades are “Moderate,” not “Low.” Electricians, plumbers and HVAC techs spend part of their day on things AI can help with: quotes, code lookups, diagnostics, scheduling and paperwork. The hands-on work is still the job. BLS expects all three to grow faster than the +3.5% average for all jobs: HVAC +10.9%, electricians +9.2% and plumbers +6.8%.
  • Many “Low” jobs are natural one-person businesses. 31.3% of painters, 25.1% of carpenters, 24.4% of tree trimmers and 20.2% of landscapers are self-employed. So are 48.1% of hairstylists (“Moderate”).
  • Personal services are growing. BLS projects massage therapists +15.3% (“Low”), animal caretakers +12.1% and hairstylists +7.7%. Childcare is the exception: childcare worker jobs are projected at -2.0%, though preschool teachers grow +4.5%.
  • The desk jobs look different. Bookkeeping clerks (-5.6%), secretaries (-6.0%) and customer service reps (-5.3%) are “Very high” and expected to shrink. If you plan a bookkeeping, admin or design business, expect clients to ask what you add beyond what AI tools do.

Low-exposure business ideas with a startup guide on our site:

AI exposure, jobs, pay and outlook for common small-business occupations
Occupation BLS AI exposure U.S. jobs, May 2025 Median pay Projected growth, 2025–35 Self-employed Our guide
Skilled trades
Electricians Moderate 757,220 $63,190 +9.2% 7.1% —
Plumbers, pipefitters & steamfitters Moderate 465,840 $63,800 +6.8% 8.0% —
HVAC mechanics & installers Moderate 409,670 $61,010 +10.9% 6.3% HVAC business guide
Carpenters Low 670,090 $60,580 +3.9% 25.1% —
Painters (construction & maintenance) Low 225,190 $49,400 +3.0% 31.3% —
Roofers Low 135,490 $55,440 +5.3% 19.8% —
Auto service technicians & mechanics Moderate 704,640 $50,620 +5.0% 14.6% —
General maintenance & repair workers Low 1,529,700 $49,590 +4.2% 0.9% —
Outdoor and cleaning work
Landscaping & groundskeeping workers Low 952,640 $39,150 +4.7% 20.2% Landscaping business guide
Tree trimmers & pruners Low 55,160 $50,960 +4.2% 24.4% Tree service guide
Pest control workers Moderate 102,620 $45,250 +5.5% 5.4% —
Janitors & cleaners Low 2,209,760 $36,840 +2.2% 4.8% Cleaning business guide
Maids & housekeeping cleaners Low 860,670 $35,510 +0.6% 13.7% Cleaning business guide
Personal services
Childcare workers Moderate 518,910 $34,980 -2.0% 24.2% Daycare guide
Preschool teachers Moderate 478,780 $38,140 +4.5% 0.9% Daycare guide
Hairdressers, hairstylists & cosmetologists Moderate 305,710 $35,790 +7.7% 48.1% Hair salon guide
Barbers Moderate 15,000 $38,210 +3.3% 79.9% Hair salon guide
Massage therapists Low 98,790 $58,450 +15.3% 35.6% Massage business guide
Animal caretakers (groomers, pet sitters) Moderate 266,910 $35,360 +12.1% 24.8% —
Food
Cooks, restaurant Moderate 1,409,890 $37,390 +12.1% — Food truck guide
For comparison: common desk jobs in small firms
Bookkeeping, accounting & auditing clerks Very high 1,373,680 $50,670 -5.6% 5.6% —
Tax preparers Very high 76,480 $54,920 +4.7% 17.6% —
Secretaries & admin assistants Very high 1,706,790 $47,540 -6.0% 1.5% —
Customer service representatives Very high 2,595,750 $44,770 -5.3% 0.5% —
Graphic designers Very high 197,830 $62,960 -1.7% 20.5% —
Interpreters & translators Very high 52,060 $60,170 +2.0% 27.6% —
Paralegals & legal assistants High 392,880 $62,890 -0.3% 2.1% —
Insurance sales agents Very high 479,100 $62,280 +3.3% 11.8% —
Private detectives & investigators High 35,580 $51,220 +5.5% 9.8% PI business guide

Job counts and pay: BLS OEWS, May 2025 (employees only; the self-employed aren’t counted). Growth and self-employed share: BLS Employment Projections 2025–35. “—” = not published.

For how common these trades are in each state, see our trade labor density by state study. For how trade job postings compare with tech postings, see trade jobs vs. tech jobs since ChatGPT.

Exposure and pay

Scatter plot of occupations by Microsoft AI applicability score and median pay, colored by BLS exposure category. Hands-on jobs cluster at low scores. Software developers, tax preparers, insurance sales agents and customer service reps sit at higher scores. Electricians $63,190, plumbers $63,800, HVAC techs $61,010.
Each dot is one occupation, sized by U.S. jobs. Left to right: Microsoft’s AI applicability score. Color: BLS category.

AI chatbots are mostly good at reading, writing, summarizing and answering questions. That’s a big part of many well-paid office jobs, so higher-exposure jobs tend to pay more. Lower-paid service jobs, like maids ($35,510) and childcare workers ($34,980), sit at the low-exposure end.

The skilled trades stand out on this chart: little AI overlap and pay in the $60,000s. The median electrician earned $63,190 in May 2025.

Do other AI measures agree?

There’s no single right way to measure AI exposure, so we checked the BLS ranking against two other measures:

  • Microsoft’s AI applicability score (Microsoft Research, “Working with AI,” 2025). It is based on what people asked Microsoft’s Bing Copilot to help with, and how well it did. It is scored from 0 to 1.
  • Anthropic’s observed exposure (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026). It is based on how people use Claude for work tasks. It gives extra weight to tasks where AI does the work rather than helps.

For each state we averaged each score across all jobs, weighting by how many people hold each job. Then we ranked the states.

Two scatter plots comparing state ranks. BLS rank vs Microsoft rank: agreement 0.93. BLS rank vs Anthropic rank: agreement 0.96. D.C. is #1 on all three and Wyoming is #51 on all three.
State ranks on each measure. 1 = most exposed. Labels far from the dashed line are states where the measures disagree.

The rankings line up well. D.C. is #1 and Wyoming #51 on all three. The biggest gaps: Nevada, South Dakota, Hawaii and Vermont rank higher on Microsoft’s measure than on BLS’s. New York ranks #2 on Anthropic’s measure but #9 on BLS’s.

One honest caveat: BLS uses Microsoft’s and Anthropic’s data as 2 of its 5 inputs, so some agreement is built in. The two company measures also disagree more on single jobs than on states. Across 800 occupations their rank correlation is 0.58. State totals smooth those differences out.

On the question that matters most here, they agree fully. None of the jobs BLS rates “Low” lands in the most-exposed group on either company’s measure. We defined that group as the top-scoring jobs that together hold the same 31.7% share of U.S. jobs as BLS’s “Very high” group.

AI exposure in every state

Click a column heading to sort. State names link to our guides for starting a business in each state. Download the full data (CSV).

Rank State Very high High Moderate Low Very high jobs Low jobs Jobs matched Microsoft rank Anthropic rank
1 District of Columbia 48.9% 26.0% 16.0% 9.1% 334,740 62,060 97.5% 1 1
2 Colorado 36.4% 24.2% 24.3% 15.2% 1,037,680 434,090 99.3% 2 9
3 Maryland 36.1% 26.5% 22.2% 15.2% 982,910 414,600 98.5% 6 7
4 Virginia 35.8% 24.3% 23.7% 16.2% 1,453,170 658,010 98.8% 3 6
5 Massachusetts 35.3% 26.4% 24.0% 14.4% 1,263,380 513,850 98.4% 4 4
6 Washington 34.8% 22.8% 25.2% 17.2% 1,221,670 603,550 98.7% 9 16
7 Florida 34.3% 23.7% 24.2% 17.8% 3,362,830 1,750,420 98.9% 5 3
8 Utah 34.2% 23.8% 23.6% 18.4% 581,370 313,350 98.0% 8 5
9 New York 34.1% 24.4% 26.4% 15.1% 3,285,550 1,458,130 99.5% 15 2
10 North Carolina 33.1% 23.4% 25.1% 18.4% 1,627,090 906,000 99.5% 10 15
11 Delaware 32.9% 24.5% 26.2% 16.3% 153,630 76,290 96.3% 12 10
12 Georgia 32.8% 24.2% 25.4% 17.6% 1,585,590 852,070 99.0% 11 17
13 New Hampshire 32.7% 27.1% 24.2% 16.1% 220,270 108,410 98.7% 7 8
14 New Jersey 32.6% 26.1% 23.9% 17.4% 1,388,080 740,540 99.3% 18 18
15 Arizona 32.4% 24.3% 25.6% 17.7% 1,037,580 565,850 98.9% 13 11
16 Texas 32.4% 25.2% 25.8% 16.7% 4,546,430 2,342,310 99.8% 17 12
17 Rhode Island 31.8% 25.8% 24.8% 17.7% 149,910 83,450 94.2% 14 13
18 California 31.7% 23.9% 27.2% 17.2% 5,757,260 3,122,880 99.6% 26 23
19 Connecticut 31.6% 27.1% 25.7% 15.6% 526,060 258,920 98.0% 19 19
20 Minnesota 31.6% 24.8% 26.9% 16.8% 926,890 493,090 99.5% 20 14
21 Illinois 30.6% 25.9% 25.2% 18.4% 1,855,620 1,112,870 99.4% 21 21
22 Oregon 30.6% 24.6% 26.7% 18.1% 596,540 354,050 99.2% 27 32
23 Michigan 30.5% 24.3% 27.4% 17.8% 1,338,490 780,120 99.5% 24 26
24 South Carolina 30.4% 24.1% 26.6% 18.9% 696,280 433,440 99.3% 16 20
25 Tennessee 30.0% 23.3% 27.2% 19.5% 980,710 636,430 99.6% 36 29
26 New Mexico 29.7% 24.8% 27.1% 18.3% 255,690 157,720 98.8% 35 22
27 Pennsylvania 29.7% 25.5% 27.1% 17.7% 1,797,530 1,072,900 99.9% 39 25
28 Nebraska 29.6% 25.3% 25.6% 19.4% 300,010 196,710 98.8% 28 33
29 Wisconsin 29.3% 23.2% 27.8% 19.7% 856,120 573,610 99.2% 33 28
30 Missouri 29.1% 26.0% 27.1% 17.7% 846,580 515,110 99.0% 34 24
31 Kansas 29.1% 25.0% 26.6% 19.2% 414,110 273,690 98.9% 25 34
32 Ohio 29.0% 25.9% 26.7% 18.4% 1,607,340 1,019,250 99.7% 37 30
33 Vermont 28.8% 30.1% 23.9% 17.3% 83,560 50,050 95.4% 22 37
34 Oklahoma 28.8% 25.4% 25.4% 20.5% 489,360 348,180 99.6% 32 31
35 Idaho 28.4% 24.8% 26.4% 20.4% 239,960 171,880 98.5% 42 27
36 Iowa 28.2% 25.2% 27.6% 19.0% 437,830 294,760 99.4% 31 36
37 Hawaii 28.1% 26.6% 26.2% 19.1% 171,040 116,110 97.1% 23 41
38 Montana 28.0% 27.0% 26.2% 18.7% 140,510 93,980 98.0% 38 42
39 Maine 28.0% 26.4% 26.5% 19.1% 175,520 119,680 97.8% 41 40
40 Alabama 28.0% 24.4% 27.6% 20.1% 580,940 416,620 98.2% 40 35
41 South Dakota 27.5% 24.9% 25.8% 21.7% 124,680 98,530 99.1% 30 43
42 Arkansas 27.4% 25.2% 27.5% 19.9% 353,320 257,440 99.1% 44 38
43 Kentucky 27.1% 25.0% 28.0% 19.8% 539,470 394,260 99.4% 43 39
44 Alaska 26.9% 28.6% 24.6% 19.9% 85,420 63,000 97.4% 48 50
45 Nevada 26.2% 23.4% 29.8% 20.6% 401,860 315,710 98.8% 29 44
46 Indiana 26.2% 23.7% 28.9% 21.2% 834,010 677,120 99.6% 45 45
47 Louisiana 26.0% 25.4% 27.2% 21.3% 499,390 409,460 99.1% 49 46
48 West Virginia 25.5% 27.4% 27.4% 19.7% 176,970 136,820 99.0% 46 47
49 North Dakota 25.3% 25.3% 28.0% 21.5% 106,670 90,830 98.4% 50 48
50 Mississippi 24.9% 24.6% 28.1% 22.3% 284,540 254,270 98.1% 47 49
51 Wyoming 24.6% 26.4% 26.9% 22.1% 67,140 60,370 97.2% 51 51
— United States 31.7% 24.7% 26.0% 17.6% 49,233,970 27,442,170 100.0% — —

Shares are of each state’s jobs that could be matched to a BLS category. “Jobs matched” is that share of all jobs in the state. The rest are small job counts BLS doesn’t publish. Rank 1 = highest “Very high” share. Microsoft and Anthropic ranks use job-weighted average scores.

What this means if you’re starting a business

For a practical path from trade experience to business ownership, see our guide to plumbing contractor business setup, including qualifications, insurance, pricing and customers.

Wyoming electrical business owners. Lower measured AI exposure does not remove the need for trade qualification or establish local demand. Our guide to starting an electrical business in Wyoming covers the master of record, contractor license, state workers’ compensation registration and permits needed to turn trade experience into an operating business.

South Carolina electrical startups. Hands-on work still needs a qualified business behind it. Our guide to starting an electrical business in South Carolina explains the residential and commercial licensing routes, coverage, local approvals and cash planning before taking customers.

For a practical path from trade experience to business ownership, see our guide to electrical contractor business setup, including qualifications, insurance, pricing and customers.

In Georgia, turn that trade-business idea into a practical checklist with our guide to starting an electrical business in Georgia, covering the current license classes, insurance, registration and first-job preparations.

  • Hands-on work is the safer bet for now. If a customer needs you on site, AI can help you run the business but can’t do the job. Trades and personal services all sit in BLS’s two lower groups.
  • Use AI for the office side. Quotes, invoices, scheduling, reviews and marketing are the “exposed” parts of almost any small business. That’s where AI tools can save you time. Construction firms are picking it up faster than any other industry; see small-business AI use by industry.
  • In high-exposure places, more businesses already use AI. D.C. and Colorado, #1 and #2 here, rank #2 and #4 of 49 for business AI use (30.7% and 28.1% of businesses in recent Census surveys). Expect competitors there to use AI for quotes, ads and customer messages.
  • Look at local demand, not just the label. A “Low” exposure job still needs customers. Check how many workers and businesses your state already has in our trade labor density data before you pick a trade.
  • Where AI gets built is a different map. California, Washington and Massachusetts lead for AI patents per resident. See AI patents by state.
What this data can’t tell you

  • It can’t tell you which jobs will disappear. BLS says exposure is not job loss, lower pay or automation.
  • The AI measures describe tools as of 2023–2025. AI changes fast, and robots for physical work aren’t included.
  • Job counts are wage and salary jobs from May 2025. Self-employed owners aren’t counted, and many trade and salon workers are self-employed.
  • Exposure labels are national. An electrician in Ohio gets the same label as one in Oregon, even if the work differs.
  • Anthropic’s measure reflects how people use Claude, and Microsoft’s reflects Bing Copilot. Neither covers all AI use.

Cite or share this data

Journalists, researchers and educators are welcome to use these numbers with a link back to this page.

Source: StartBusinessByState.com analysis of BLS AI exposure categories (Aug. 2026) and BLS OEWS employment by state (May 2025). https://startbusinessbystate.com/ai-proof-jobs-by-state/

Embed the map:

<a href=”https://startbusinessbystate.com/ai-proof-jobs-by-state/”><img src=”https://startbusinessbystate.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/ai-exposed-jobs-map.png” alt=”Share of jobs highly exposed to AI by state” width=”1200″></a><br>Source: StartBusinessByState.com analysis of BLS data

Methodology and sources

  1. Jobs by occupation and state. BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), May 2025 state and national files. We used the 830 detailed occupations for the 50 states and D.C. (155,495,730 jobs nationwide). OEWS counts wage and salary jobs. It leaves out the self-employed.
  2. Primary measure: BLS AI exposure categories. From BLS’s AI exposure categories table (published August 27, 2026), which labels 831 occupations Low, Moderate, High or Very high. BLS uses the same occupation codes as OEWS, so we matched on the exact 6-digit code. All 830 OEWS occupations matched. (One BLS occupation, fishers, isn’t in OEWS.)
  3. State shares. For each state we added up jobs in each category and divided by the state’s matched jobs. BLS doesn’t publish some small state counts to protect privacy, so matched jobs cover 94.2% (RI) to 99.9% (PA) of each state’s jobs (median 98.9%). Dividing by all jobs instead gives almost the same ranking (rank correlation 0.99).
  4. Cross-checks. Microsoft’s AI applicability scores (v1.1, CC BY 4.0) and Anthropic’s Economic Index job exposure (CC BY). We matched exact codes first. Where OEWS reports a combined or “all other” occupation the source doesn’t score, we used the average score of the source’s occupations in the same SOC broad group. That covers 99.4% of U.S. jobs for Microsoft and 93.9% for Anthropic. Anthropic’s file has no score for some large jobs, including home health and personal care aides, so its state averages leave those jobs out.
  5. Pay and growth. Median pay is from OEWS May 2025. Projected growth and self-employed shares are from BLS Employment Projections 2025–35, published with the AI exposure table.
  6. Business AI use. From our small-business AI use by state page: the Census Bureau’s Business Trends and Outlook Survey, average of the three surveys from July 27 to September 6, 2026.

All scripts and raw files are saved so the numbers can be rebuilt. We didn’t adjust or re-weight any source. This page won’t update automatically; BLS publishes new OEWS figures once a year.

FAQ

Which state has the most jobs exposed to AI?

D.C., where 48.9% of jobs are in occupations BLS rates “Very high.” Among states, Colorado (36.4%), Maryland (36.1%) and Virginia (35.8%) lead.

Which state has the fewest?

Wyoming (24.6%), then Mississippi (24.9%) and North Dakota (25.3%).

Does “exposed to AI” mean the job will be replaced?

No. BLS says exposure does not mean job loss, lower pay or automation. It means AI tools overlap with some of the job’s tasks. Many exposed workers will use AI as a tool.

What jobs are AI-proof?

None for sure. The least exposed are hands-on jobs: roofers, carpenters, painters, landscapers, tree trimmers, janitors, maids and massage therapists are all rated “Low.” Electricians, plumbers, HVAC techs, hairstylists and childcare workers are “Moderate.”

Why are electricians and plumbers “Moderate” and not “Low”?

Part of their work is paperwork, estimating, code lookups and troubleshooting, which AI can help with. The core of the job is still physical. BLS projects both to grow faster than average.

Are self-employed workers included?

Not in the state job counts. OEWS covers employees only. That matters for trades and salons, where many people work for themselves.

Related research: Small-business AI use by state · Trade jobs vs. tech jobs since ChatGPT · Trade labor density by state · Data center boom by state